The latest Lakers/Celtics/Clippers hoopla around CP3/Dwight/Griffin/KG/Doc, etc.

nba-twitter-playoffs_02

Holy hell, this sure is some insane chatter going on these days. The inmates are increasingly looking to take over the asylum, aren’t they? Or are they? The media LOVES to talk ENDLESSLY about CP3 wants this, Dwight wants that, etc. etc. But none of us really know what’s going on. Nor should we unless free agency begins and these guys ‘do what’s best for them’ (to paraphrase Dwight).

We’ve all heard the rumors (that’s all they are now) going back and forth of the Clippers and Celtics talking, and the others about Dwight maybe wanting to team up with CP3 on the Clippers. There’s also the chance that IF the Lakers don’t give a FUCK about the Salary Cap they can bring Chris Paul to the Lakers– He and Dwight both love L.A., but Chris isn’t sold on the Clippers and Don Sterling’s firing of VDN and blaming Chris REALLY made Chris upset (supposedly, according to RUMORS).

But let’s also look at some dollars and cents here. You can toss in draft picks, etc. to ‘sweeten’ a deal, but the fact is salaries must match within 125% either way (for a single contract year, beyond that doesn’t matter), salary cap is a bigger issue to consider for some teams than others (and some owners than others, for that matter), as as future plans. Here’s what I can glean so far:

LAL-LAC-BOS

Lakers: Want to win championships, will spend money like water
Clippers: Want to sell tickets to games and merchandise, uber cheap owner
Celtics: Want to win championships, cautious about money generally

So when you think about it that way, when people are saying that Clippers owner Donald Sterling wants to get this player and that I look at them twice and slap them sideways. You all know it comes down to the dollars, and Sterling doesn’t like to open his checkbook that often. He MASSIVELY overpaid DeAndre Jordan, and now no one wants that guys crappy salary. Blake is a dunking machine who plays no defense and has a terrible shot, WITH A MASSIVE CONTRACT, and needs someone to pass to him, AND he’s got knee issues. Last time we saw a guy like that? AMARE STOUDAMIRE! I think that’s a really REALLY bad omen.

With that said, the Lakers want long term stars, and even with Dwight having had a bad year, HE WAS COMING OFF BACK SURGERY, and we had another shitty coaching transition, and the coach didn’t know how to limit player minutes, etc. etc.

But again… back to the dollars and cents. Dwight is a free agent, Chris Paul is a free agent. Everyone else in the mix is on contracts. Dwight and Chris can each get the most money with their current teams (Dwight: Lakers, Chris: Clippers) including a 5th year. SO… if these guys want to play together either they A) go to the other guy’s team, or B) go somewhere else together (Atlanta or Houston?) and sacrifice that 5th year together… that doesn’t sound like ‘doing what’s best for me’ to me, does it? Even if SOMEHOW they convince their teams to do sign and trades, here are what the other possible tradable guys are making next year:

Lakers:
Pau Gasol – $19.3 mil, 1 year left, solid player but expensive
Steve Nash – $9.3 mil, 2 years left, trailing off skillwise big time
Metta World Peace – $7.7 mil (player option), 1 year left, inconsistent and trailing off

Clippers:
DeAndre Jordan – $11.0 mil, 2 years left, massively overpaid for poor production
Blake Griffin – $16.4 mil, 4 years left, explosive dunker, questionable knees and… that’s it
Jamal Crawford – $5.2 mil, 3 years left, solid perimeter scorer, not bad contract
Eric Bledsoe – $2.6 mil, 2 years left, great backup PG, unsure how he’d fare as starter, cheap for 2 years then may command big jump
Caron Butler – $8.0 mil, 1 year left, disappeared in the playoffs, expiring contract

Celtics:
Paul Pierce – $15.3 mil, 1 year left, on the decline but still really good, expiring value
Kevin Garnett – $11.5 mil, 2 years left, has a no trade clause, will ONLY go to L.A. TEAMS, will only leave if Pierce is getting traded
Jeff Green – $8.7 mil, 3 years left (3rd is player option), picked up his play but is fairly expensive vs. his production as a role player
Courtney Lee – $5.2 mil, 3 years left, similar to Green is young and athletic but lengthy contract for uncertainty
Jason Terry – $5.2 mil, 2 years left, not as hot a shooter as his Mavs days, like a better Steve Blake

So there are some big questions being considered, and most don’t have solid answers:

NBA: Playoffs-San Antonio Spurs at Los Angeles Lakers

If Dwight said he’s leaving the Lakers, why would the Lakers agree to a sign-and-trade?

The Lakers have hinted to wanting to remain competitive for Summer 2014. What could they get from the Clippers? Blake Griffin would give them something now, but the Amare comparisons do not bode well for them. Cap room might be a greater consideration. Getting Eric Bledsoe would be nice, but the Lakers don’t even know if they’ll be running D’Antoni’s run-and-gun offense with the even older Kobe, Pau, and Metta (if they don’t amnesty him first) even if Bledsoe and Griffin are on the team.

Clippers-Celtics

If the Clippers/Celtics talks are ‘serious’, how can anything happen without the Clippers shipping out DeAndre Jordan and Blake Griffin, and the Celtics shipping out Kevin Garnett and Paul Pierce?

KG has already said he won’t waive his no trade clause unless Pierce is gone, and they market to nab Pierce is not that big right now. So IF the Clippers agreed to take Pierce and KG (instantly making themselves much older), the only way (moneywise) the trade could work, and bring Doc Rivers over in the process, would be to send the Celtics DeAndre (who while young is still pretty useless offensively) AND Blake– the latter whom the Clippers said is ‘untouchable’ for the most part. So what is the point of these talks? The Clippers want to impress CP3 and get him to stay by bringing in Doc Rivers to coach and KG to play PF/C… but they’re not willing to trade Blake Griffin… and the Celtics don’t just want DeAndre Jordan, and while getting Eric Bledsoe could be nice, it doesn’t work moneywise, and he and Rondo would be battling it out for who controls the ball, kinda like Monta Ellis and Brandon Jennings did in Milwaukee this past season… Oh and KG WON’T waive his no trade clause unless Pierce is being shipped out…. OH AND YOU NEED TO SEND OUT PIERCE AND KG FOR BLAKE AND DEANDRE FOR THE MONEY TO WORK… AAARRGGHHH…. Don Sterling’s idiocy is off the charts here, and the Celtics’ Danny Ainge is smart enough to think about his team’s long term future by just waiting for KG and Pierce’s contracts to expire after next year (well.. Pierce’s, then KG will WANT to go someplace else is just retire before the 2014-15 season).

la-sp-simers-20130305-001

How can Chris Paul and Dwight Howard ‘realistically’ end up playing together?

In total truth, both players don’t really ‘owe it’ to their latest teams, the Lakers and Clippers, to get a sign-and-trade done in any way. It would just help out their new teams (assuming they go elsewhere) with more room to bring them in, and sign some fresh blood. With that said, IF one of them wants to stay where they are and bring the other in (Chris on the Clippers, brings on Dwight.. Dwight on the Lakers, brings in Chris) they would either have to hope the ‘winning’ team can put the pressure on for a sign and trade, or be willing to take less money one way or another. Here’s the possibilities I can see being considered:

Lakers

A) CP3 and Dwight on the Lakers – If Chris wants to be a Laker again (after his 47 mins of it 2 years ago before Stern nixed it) it would first be on the Lakers to go WAYYYYY over the salary cap. This has a slim to none chance of happening. Chris would lose on that 4th year by donning the purple and gold, but more importantly his lets say $19.5 mil salary (up from around $17.8 mil last year) would add to the Lakers’ mix of these guys: Kobe at $30.5 mil, Dwight at $20.5 mil (estimated), Pau at $19.3 mil, Nash at $9.3 mil, Metta (likely) at $7.7 mil… and another few mil for others… but that’s JUST the starting lineup! A sign and trade would help the Lakers, but why would the Clippers do that? The Clippers wouldn’t have any interest in Pau (even if he’s an expiring), or willing to take the elder Nash vs. their more than capable Bledsoe who’s younger, probably better, and definitely cheaper (and Don Sterling LOVES cheap!). IF the Lakers were to say ‘fuck it, let’s burn HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS IN SALARY CAP PENALTIES!!’… then this could happen.

Clippers

B) CP3 and Dwight on the Clippers – This is being bandied about quite a lot lately. Both guys want to stay in L.A., and play together, and the Clippers might be able to force it to happen. IF Dwight just walked straight over, this would be mega expensive for the Clippers. BOTH Chris and Dwight would need new contracts, and Dwight would definitely not get that 5th year, but it would still be a ton of money. Still… is it worth it to him to lose $30 MILLION to stay in the same town? If so, here’s the cost to the Clippers without a sign a trade: CP3 at $19.5 mil, Dwight at $20.5 mil, Griffin at $16.4 mil, DeAndre at $11.0 mil, next highest would be Caron Butler at $8.0 mil…. Eric Bledsoe at just $2.6 mil is cheap and good, but don’t impact the salary cap. But given Don Sterling’s obsession with saving money why would he break the bank to keep Chris Paul when he can just promote Eric Bledsoe and let Chris Paul walk? He then WOULDN’T have to pay nearly $20 mil to BOTH Paul and Howard… saving $40 mil alone on the contracts, and tens of millions more on salary cap penalties (the team would have to go over to bring in role players). In the new CBA’s world of the NBA teams and pretty much afford 2 big stars, 2 medium stars, and a bunch of role players IF they want to stay under the cap (the Lakers don’t usually care). SO…. that means the only want this Clippers could make this happen is to get the Lakers to agree to a sign and trade for Griffin and another $2 to $4 mil piece. The Lakers would say NO WAY to DeAndre Jordan ($11.0 mil) and Caron Butler ($8.0 mil) for Dwight, so Blake it is… but then that means the only other player that would be ‘sweet’ enough might be Bledsoe… who’s a great, cheap player. Good on that… but the Lakers are still wary of Blake who players no D, has no jump shooting, is injury prone, and would slam any chances of cap space later if he’s supposed to be a franchise player– which everyone says he really isn’t worth being…. So…. the Lakers would probably say no here and opt for the cap room, leaving the Clippers to decide if paying an assload is worth it (they’re not the Lakers, but let’s see if they have the balls to play that very expensive game).

Rockets

C) CP3 and Dwight on the Rockets – These could be the most likely scenarios if they want to play together. The Rockets are a bit tricky because James Harden is making $13.7 mil next year, and while Lin and Omer Asuk are both making just $5.2 mil in 2013-14, in the final 2014-15 of their contracts it balloons up to $15.9 mil each!! Yikes!! Getting both CP3 and Dwight to come over now means they have to find takers for both Lin and Asuk… and NO ONE wants either of them (especially with such painful blow up contracts!!). So a sign and trade might be next to impossible unless James Harden is part of that deal– ironic considering he was the one lobbying to get Dwight over in Houston. If CP3 and Howard walk over they both lose a 5th year worth $25-$30 mil, and even with the ‘Texas saving of no income tax’ it doesn’t matter too much– players pay taxes based on EVERY GAME IN EVERY STATE THEY PLAY IN. A few more games in your home state really don’t make as big an impact as many think it does.

Hawks

D) CP3 and Dwight on the Hawks – So then there’s Atlanta; the Hawks have a very unique proposition for both CP3 and Dwight, should they want to come over. Josh Smith is off the books, so even if he suddenly wanted to come back to play with buddy Dwight and new friend Chris Paul, they Hawks would tell him to hold up. Smith made $13.2 mil last year and spent all season making it known he wanted out. If Chris and Dwight took up $40 mil in new contracts, the Hawks might not even want to sign Smith. Also, the ONLY big contract on the team next year is Al Horford at $12 mil. The rest of the team is pretty much empty right now… meaning after Dwight and Chris signed up the Hawks could go shopping for cheap role players to add on. Still, with Dwight at C, Horford at his natural PF, and CP3 at PG you’ve got a solid tandem that would challenge LeBron, Bosh, and Wade in the East next season. Again, BOTH Dwight and Chris would have to be willing to sacrifice that 5th year, but as of right now it’s the most likely scenario for them to play together and NOT seek some crazy sign and trade deal. The only small hitch (other than both guys saying goodbye to a 5th year of $25-$30 mil) is Dwight has for some reason not been a fan of playing in his hometown of Atlanta. He’s never elaborated on it, maybe he’s too close to Orlando, but that’s something there. He’d be on his 3rd team in 3 years, but it would be the price to pay for playing alongside Chris Paul.

So anyway, there’s my breakdown of the latest on the Lakers/Clippers/Celtics/Dwight/CP3/KG/Pierce/Griffin/Doc insanity going on these days. Man, I almost miss the pre-Twitter days where we had to wait entire days or weeks for news! 🙂

Advertisements

My Beautiful Mistake: How I switched from the iPhone 5 to HTC One… then went back 7 hours later

htc and iphone

On April 10th, 1912 the British passenger ocean liner RMS Titanic was launched on her maiden voyage from Southampton, UK, sailing for her destination port in New York City. It was a grand affair, and one that was touted to usher in a new age of megaships, particularly for her creator, shipping company White Star Line. Yeah well… that didn’t happen. We all know that just 4 days later the Titanic hit a nasty iceberg, sank into the depths of the Atlantic, took the lives of 1,502 passengers with her, and led to an incredibly successful and melodramatically annoying blockbuster film 85 years later. We’ll get back to this Titanic bit of stuff later on…

101 years since that maritime disaster I’ve been a happy Apple fanboy (more or less) who’s been enjoying my semi-regular iPhone updates since the launch of the first one back in 2007. The beautiful industrial design and production machinery of each successive iPhone has been better than the last, the iOS operating system has kept it super simple while making regular smart updates, and the entire ‘it just works’ ecosystem between my iPhone, MacBook, iTunes (despite some animosity), and my iPad kept my Apple life a pretty happy one.

iphone 5

Despite my bliss, I’d occasionally wonder about all the Android fuss that claimed the loyalty of various friends and colleagues. While in the beginning I was in the strong majority of iPhone users, over the past few years I’d see more and more start to depart for Android pastures. Most would snap up Samsung offerings (particularly of the Galaxy S II, III, or now IV line) while a few would take up residence with other Android smartphone makers like LG, Acer, Asus, Motorola, and even… HTC.

By late 2012 I was still holding on to my iPhone fiercely– defending the higher cost for higher quality, the versatility of its App functions, widespread appeal and recognition, etc. etc… But my iPad started to lose the arguments game. I loved my 64 GB WiFi iPad 2, even holding onto it well into the release of 3 new iPad models. At some point, however, I realized I was just using it for eBooks, simple email, and occasional movie or Lakers game watching (via the Time Warner Cable SportsNet app). Was a 9″ screen really worth a $500 (or in this case $700 for the 64 GB model) price point? I decided to wade into the Android waters by selling my iPad 2 and snapping up (justifying it as a holiday gift to myself) a Google-branded Nexus 7 for just $199… Well technically just $179 since it was a brand new one via eBay. I thought about an Amazon Kindle Fire HD (similar to the non-HD version I bought my wife), but I wanted some iPad level functionality and customization the Kindle Fire HD just didn’t provide.

nexus 7

Anyway, It was a bit awkward at first, transitioning from an all Apple interface to an all Google one, but once you really embrace the fact that most of your core uses (email, calendar, file sharing, navigation) are really Google powered, then it wasn’t that bad. I came to love widgets, and the 7″ screen size wasn’t an issue, especially with such great physical and pixel quality built in. The size was even better for traveling, and wayyyyy better for reading eBooks than I thought possible with a 9″ iPad. The iPad mini came out a bit later, but at $330 it was just a tad more bang for way more buck. I soon didn’t miss my old iPad at all, and even today I love seeing the quick widget updates, playing with the different Android settings, and switching between my eBooks, Flipboard news, and YouTube video viewing super quickly with my Nexus 7 tablet.

macbook dual

And then there was the smartphone issue. My loyalty to Apple really solidified with the purchase of my first iPhone around 2007 or 2008… and I followed up with buying an all aluminum MacBook right after finishing up grad school (recently covering it up in all carbon black casing). Even thinking about transitioning to Android sounded like heresy! So I kept saying no thanks and would keep pointing out the limitations of the splintered Android  offerings smartphone-verse. This one’s too slow, that one’s too ugly, this doesn’t have sounds as good as the iPhone, that one has terrible battery life compared to the latest iPhone. Etc. etc. Samsung kept grabbing Android markets hare, but every model they spat out was just too crummy for my snobby iPhone mindset.

Then HTC decided to show up and create the non-iPhone, iPhone. After playing catch up for years to big brother Samsung, HTC was looking like it had to knock one out of the park if it wanted to avoid getting crushed in 2013. The company’s past phones were always short on one this or another, and it never made too much of a dent in the Android community beyond a very niche core. With Apple kicking ass, Microsoft off walking into a wall with it’s Windows phones (seriously Microsoft, just GIVE IT UP), and Samsung consolidating all of the Android lands, HTC and its president Peter Chou stuck its reputation, its life, and its future on a new flagship model– the HTC One.

HTC One dual

When I saw pre-release pictures of the HTC One I got super excited for it, as if THIS was the next iPhone. It had a larger screen, a smooth aluminum (or anodized black, my preference) roundish backing, dual FRONT speakers, IR output for controlling your TV, and a cool Flipboard-feature called BlinkFeed for news and updates junkies like myself. I would keep reminding myself, this was NOT an Apple smartphone, it was an Android phone. Would I be ready to make the jump? To say goodbye to iOS with the seemingly meaningless limitations and dive headfirst into the unknown of Google’s Android phones?

I wasn’t quite sure so I had to play with it at an AT&T (my carrier) store. So I went in and played with one for a few minutes… Then I went back a few days later… and again a few more… and did so for nearly 4 weeks. Always playing with more of the features, getting accustomed to the Android OS that was somewhat familiar but somewhat different than the iPhone world I’d been in for almost 6 years. I kept playing with them, kept getting intrigued, kept loving the feel and appeal. I even did the financial breakdown of what I could get for my iPhone 5 on eBay and what the HTC One would cost me. After working it out with AT&T over the phone they ditched any early upgrade costs and penalties, and I decided to order the black HTC One to replace my still great iPhone 5. The new device arrived just 2 days later, and I set about backing up my iPhone 5 to iTunes, activating the HTC One, and using the HTC Sync Manager to copy my contacts, settings, music, and photos over to the new Android smartphone I just got. I was super excited about what this frontier would be like. Having an Android tablet and smartphone, and just an Apple laptop left. Crazy but interesting to see how letting Google run the show would turn out…

droid-v-iphone

Then I started having a few quibbles… Then a few more. The settings wouldn’t work the same way I thought they would… Certain apps bugged me in how they ran, and the general interface interaction of Android (not just the HTC Sense skin) was a bit… unintuitive compared to iOS. The widgets I loved on my Nexus 7 tablet were more of a bother than a help on the HTC One, even with the larger 4.7″ screen (compared to the iPhone 5’s 4″ screen). The dual speakers with Beats By Dre BoomSound were great, but unless using the rest of the device was a joy I just didn’t care. I found making calls a hassle, and the Gmail app on iOS was WAYYYYY more sleek, simple, and beautiful than the one on an Android device. I couldn’t use the great Fantastical calendar app I had on my iPhone, and after an hour I stopped using BlinkFeed in favor of trusty Flipboard.

I was starting to worry that I had made a pretty big mistake, and one I might not be able to back out of. I kept trying to love the device, but other than its gorgeous physical look and feel there just wasn’t enough in the Android OS on a smartphone to keep me happy. I missed my iPhone and wanted it back, working (somewhat) as a phone and more! I got AT&T on the line, and within 20 minutes they assured me all was well, I could return the HTC One to them and they switch my iPhone 5 back on. PHEW! No extra fees, no charges, nada. In less than half an hour I went back to my iPhone world and it was as if that HTC One nightmare never happened.

nightmare

So what does the Titanic have to do with my foray into the Android world of the HTC One? Well for one thing, much like the Titanic, the HTC One is an incredible physical feat of beauty– all Apple copied but even more curvy and sexy in all the right ways. But when you get into the software guts of the device (and I assume most other Android phones) there is a lot left to be desired, and a bit of overconfidence is not a good thing. Android is a solid device for those who were born into it, but so far it is NOT an operating system for truly premium devices. Call iOS too simple or too limited or too anything else you want, but the fact is ‘it just works’ within the ecosystem it’s supposed to, and does so in such a way you can really say it’s a premium offering.

I looked over to my Nexus 7 and tried to figure out why I loved that but didn’t dig my even more gorgeous HTC One smartphone. After a while I think I figured it out; Android is a bit more of a challenge to get accustomed to, especially on smaller screens with more on-the-go communications needs. True, it syncs up to Google services like email and calendar well enough, but the lack of pleasing visual interfaces (compared to many apps in Apple’s store) makes using them on Android phones more of a hassle. On a tablet, though, you can sacrifice some of that for more simple uses; reading eBooks, looking at news, watching a YouTube video. But your smartphone is your digital world Swiss army knife, and you want it to be sleek AND a joy to use.

Titanic_sinking

HTC made some awesome industrial hardware with the One, but they put the wrong operating system on it. The recently released HTC First fell flat because the ultra lame Facebook Home skin was released to everyone at the same time and killed it’s ‘uniqueness’, plus no one wanted all Facebook all the time. The One is a beauty to use, but if the company really wants to kick ass (and hell, just survive) maybe they should reposition themselves as device manufacturers for Apple. The ongoing Foxconn dramas are making Apple look elsewhere, and an HTC One-like iPhone 6 would be a world class smartphone damn near everyone would love. If not, HTC will continue to act like they’re the Titantic; better than they are and running full steam into an iceberg called Samsung. Oh yeah, did you hear in the past week a large handful of top HTC brass have jumped ship? They can probably see the iceberg Peter Chou can’t. Ouch.

Could trouble in Clipperland mean Chris Paul might end up with the Lakers after all?

Super Duper Team

Ok so the Clippers are set for the playoffs, while the Lakers are still struggling to secure the 8th spot– something that may not be known until the season is officially done.

With that said, rumors keep persisting that Chris Paul, Blake Griffin, DeAndre Jordan, and Coach Vinny Del Negro are are all different pages, with the infighting threatening to tear apart the squad (1st: http://bit.ly/16Y0Mhy  2nd: http://lat.ms/XvztdG). Almost the opposite of the Lakers– infighting early in the year, getting along now– the Clippers may fall off quickly in the playoffs and lose Chris Paul in the process– if the star PG is willing to give up big bucks to walk over to the real L.A. team.

Here’s how I see it:

Clippers:
– Chris Paul is earning $17.8 mil this season, and an unrestricted FA in the summer.
– Blake Griffin makes just $7.2 mil this season, but signed a 5-year $95 mil extension starting next year. In short, he’s the Clippers’ future (they hope alongside Chris Paul).
– DeAndre Jordan makes $10.5 mil this season, $11.0 for 2013-14, and $11.4 mil for 2014-15 before he’s off their books. That’s a lot for an athletic but that’s is C wannabe.

Lakers:
– Kobe Bryant makes $27.8 mil this season and $30.4 mil the next, after which he may most likely retire.
– Pau Gasol makes $19.0 mil this season and $19.3 mil the next, after which he’d either have to take a massive pay cut (at his number of years in the league at that point [10+ years] the vet’s min for him is $1.448 mil), go elsewhere, or retire.
– Dwight Howard is earning $19.3 mil this season, and an unrestricted FA in the summer, though it’s looking likely the Lakers will offer him a 5 year max contract.
– Steve Nash is earning $8.9 mil this season, $9.3 mil in 2013-14, and $9.7 in 2014-15. He will likely retire after the 2014-15 season.
– Metta World Peace is earning $7.3 mil this season and has a player option for 2013-14 for $7.7 mil, he would be foolish to opt out and seek more (given the Lakers’ tax position) but he reporting is thinking about doing so.

I got all of the details of salaries, exceptions, maximums and minimums from Larry Coon’s CBA Salary Faq here:  http://www.cbafaq.com/salarycap.htm

It’s pretty confusing, but most things in the new CBA have been set up to close as many loopholes as possible, and to discourage players from leaving their current team for another lest they are willing to give up big money. Chris Paul is free to walk away from the Clippers after this season, but jumping onto the Lakers may not be so easy. The Lakers are WAY over the cap next year, ESPECIALLY if they sign both Dwight Howard and Chris Paul alongside Kobe Bryant, Pau Gasol, Steve Nash, and Metta World Peace (that’s a LOT of money right there).

But that’s not to say it’s not possible. A lot of it rides on the Lakers’ willingness to take on even more tax penalties for one season (2013-14) before Kobe and Pau hopefully retire, and on Chris Paul earning less from a new Lakers contract vs. a continuing Clippers one. In case you don’t remember, here are the maximum best case contracts Chris could nab with each team after this season:

CP3 ClippersContinuing with the Clippers:
Max 20% contract increase, max 7.5% annual increases (maximum $450,000 of base year), max 5 year contract
Year 1 – 2013-14 – $21,335,348
Year 2 – 2014-15 – $21,785,348
Year 3 – 2015-16 – $22,235,348
Year 4 – 2016-17 – $22,685,348
Year 5 – 2017-18 – $23,135,348
TOTAL CONTRACT – $111,176,740

CP3 LakersSigning as a FA with the Lakers:
Max 20% contract increase, max 4.5% annual increases (maximum $450,000 of base year), max 4 year contract
Year 1 – 2013-14 – $21,335,348
Year 2 – 2014-15 – $21,785,348
Year 3 – 2015-16 – $22,235,348
Year 4 – 2016-17 – $22,685,348
TOTAL CONTRACT – $88,491,392

So the max annual increases are negated with the $450,000 maximum regardless, so it comes down to losing out on that 5th year of $23.1 mil. It’s not THAT BAD, but it’s still guaranteed money nonetheless. The nice this is Chris just turned 27 in May, and after the 4th year he’d be just 31. If he’s healthy and doing great his ‘new contract’ with the Lakers (if he stayed there) or anywhere else could potentially be another 20% spike, instead of the $450,000 max additional year he’d get at age 32.

CP3 and DwightNow if Chris Paul is okay with the risk of the 5th year being open, and he’d be ready to build Showtime duo with Dwight, the Lakers fans can get really excited. But maybe not yet… The next thing is if the Lakers would be willing to take on some insane taxes for that time. Taking on Chris and Dwight’s max salary expectations for 2013-14 also falls into the first year the luxury taxes enter a graduated tax level system, so it’s gonna be BAD… even worse if you’re a ‘repeater’, which means your team was over the luxury tax limits the season before (2012-13, which the Lakers most definitely were by about $30 mil, at $100 mil the were that much past the roughly $70 mil barrier).

Here are the tax rates beginning 2013-14:

Screen Shot 2013-04-11 at 9.23.58 PM

Now let me simplify some math so everyone’s brains don’t explode at the same time. Let’s keep the players on the Lakers’ roster as in for 2013-14 (http://hoopshype.com/salaries/la_lakers.htm) and add another $10 mil or so for 4-6 various minimum salaries, for bench roles, here’s what 2013-14 might look like if the Lakers keep Dwight and get Chris:

2013-14 Lakers potential salaries:
$30.4 mil – Kobe Bryant
$23.1 mil – Dwight Howard
$21.3 mil – Chris Paul
$19.3 mil – Pau Gasol
$9.3 mil – Steve Nash
$7.7 mil – Metta World Peace (assuming he opts in)
$4.0 mil – Steve Blake
$3.9 mil – Chris Duhon
$3.5 mil – Jordan Hill
$1.5 mil – Jodie Meeks (team option, he’s cheap so I think the Lakers will keep him)
$10.0 mil – Various minimum signings
————————————————————————————————————————————–
$134.0 mil salary on contract

As if that’s not bad enough, let’s play the ‘graduated taxes for repeaters’ game too!

2013-14 Lakers potential above the luxury cap tax penalties:
Salary up to ~$70 mil = $0 (no penalty taxes)
Tier $70-$75 mil – next $5 mil x $2.50 tax rate = $12.5 mil penalty taxes
Tier $75-$80 mil – next $5 mil x $2.75 tax rate = $13.75 mil penalty taxes
Tier $80-$85 mil – next $5 mil x $3.50 tax rate = $17.5 mil penalty taxes
Tier $85-$90 mil – next $5 mil x $4.25 tax rate = $21.25 mil penalty taxes
Tier $95-$100 mil – next $5 mil x $4.75 tax rate = $23.75 mil penalty taxes
Tier $100-$105 mil – next $5 mil x $5.25 tax rate = $26.25 mil penalty taxes
Tier $105-$110 mil – next $5 mil x $5.75 tax rate = $28.75 mil penalty taxes
Tier $110-$115 mil – next $5 mil x $6.25 tax rate = $31.25 mil penalty taxes
Tier $115-$120 mil – next $5 mil x $6.75 tax rate = $33.75 mil penalty taxes
Tier $120-$125 mil – next $5 mil x $7.25 tax rate = $36.25 mil penalty taxes
Tier $125-$130 mil – next $5 mil x $7.75 tax rate = $38.75 mil penalty taxes
Tier $130-$134 mil – last $4 mil x $8.25 tax rate = $33.0 mil penalty taxes
————————————————————————————————————————————–
$316.75 mil total penalty taxes

So the Lakers would pay nearly TWO AND A HALF TIMES as much of their total salary for JUST over the cap tax penalties!! An absolutely ridiculous $450.75 MILLION in player salary and the associated penalties for having a Kobe, Pau, Dwight, Chris Paul, Nash, and Metta super duper team. I don’t know how anyone could convince Mitch K, and Jim & Jeanie Buss that it would be worth HALF A BILLION dollars to assemble this team for just one season.

Pau and KobeKobe and Pau falling off the books before 2014-15 clears $49.7 mil, and would help immensely. Beyond them, as of now that season is completely clear contract wise except for Steve Nash’s final year at $9.7 mil. Locking in Dwight and Chris means they’ll utilize about $44-$47 mil of cap space, leaving about $25 mil for other contracts to keep under the cap (make that $15 mil if they have Nash) or more likely they’ll just go over, but possibly not as much.

So basically, this utterly insane plan to assemble a super duper team with Chris and Dwight joining Kobe, Pau, Nash, and Metta would cost the Lakers BIG TIME, but then the future would be exceptionally bright and clear if the team makes a commitment to getting back under the cap. This would take some big time restraint on future spending (no LeBron chasing in the Summer of 2014) and a sharper commitment to getting young, cheap, role-defined talent like the Spurs have done over the Duncan-Parker-Ginobili era. It’s very, VERY doable, but it takes the big risk of a half billion salary and penalties payout next season, in order to really rebuilt on the fly successfully in the post-Kobe, post-Pau years. Doing this without a lull in playoff contention years is incredibly tough… but if there’s any team willing to take on mind-blowing risks like these, it’s the Los Angeles Lakers.

Oh, and replacing Mike D’Antoni with Dwight & Kobe’s much preferred Phil Jackson couldn’t hurt your championship chances either 🙂

The Lakers are rolling since early February, has their ‘Come to Jesus’ moment finally arrived?

top banner

Former Lakers’ coach Phil Jackson said the current team needed a ‘come to Jesus’ moment to get their asses in gear, and I’m wondering if this may have arrived in the passing of Dr. Jerry Buss. Since Feb 1st the Lakers have gone 8-3, with 3 straight wins since Dr. Buss’ death after the All-Star break (against solid teams in the Celtics, Blazers, and Mavs no less).

West standings

But they’re still at the 9th seed, about 3 games behind the 8th seed Rockets. Over the next week here are Lakers wins and other team losses L.A. needs to get into the 8th or 7th seed (6th or 5th would be fantastic, 4th or higher is impossible):

Mon, Feb 25:

  • Lakers @ Nuggets – Need Lakers to win
  • Celtics @ Jazz – Need Celtics to win

Tue, Feb 26:

  • Warriors @ Pacers – Need Pacers to win
  • Bucks @ Mavs – Need Bucks to win

Wed, Feb 27:

  • Warriors @ Knicks – Need Knicks to win
  • Mavs @ Grizzles – Need Grizzlies to win
  • Bucks @ Rockets – Need Bucks to win
  • Hawks @ Jazz – Need Hawks to win
  • Nuggets @ Blazers – PUSH? (Nuggets win pushes Blazers’ record down, Blazers’ win makes Nuggets’ record worse)

Thu, Feb 28:

  • T’Wolves @ Lakers – Need Lakers to win

Fri, Mar 1:

  • Rockets @ Magic – Need Magic to win
  • Warriors @ Celtics – Need Celtics to win
  • Grizzlies @ Heat – Need Heat to win (closes seed records’ gaps slightly)
  • Mavs @ Nets – Need Nets to win
  • Bobcats @ Jazz – Need Bobcats to win
  • Thunder @ Nuggets – Need Thunder to win

Sat, Mar 2:

  • Warriors @ 76ers – Need 76ers to win
  • T’Wolves @ Blazers – Need T’Wolves to win

Sun, Mar 3:

  • Hawks @ Lakers – Lakers need to win
  • Grizzlies @ Magic – Magic need to win
  • Mavs @ Rockets – PUSH? (Mavs win pushes Rockets’ record down, Rockets’ win makes Mavs’ record worse)

These aren’t ALL the games being played these days, mind you, just the ones that will impact the Lakers. So let’s see how the next week pans out. Meanwhile, if the top 4 teams in the West keep on pace then getting between the 6th and 8th seeds would make for a varied set of challenges for the Lakers:

If the Lakers get the 6th seed, would likely face the Clippers:

lakers vs clippers

  • Pros – If you can neutralize CP3 (or he gets hurt) they’re a young, disorganized team. Defense is average at best. While they’ve been a breakout regular season team, and CP3 has turned Blake Griffin into a dunking dynamo, they have yet to handle long-playoff game series like the Lakers have year after year.
  • Cons – Bevy of scoring options, CP3 can dish it everywhere AND score on you, they’ll run you out of gas if you play at their pace. If they can’t get inside for Blake’s dunks, DeAndre’s scores, or Chris Paul’s dribble shots they’ll rotate quickly out to perimeter scorers. The Lakers aren’t scoring as well as the Clippers are.

If the Lakers get the 7th seed, would likely face the Thunder:

lakers vs thunder

  • Pros – With a healthy Dwight Howard and Pau Gasol, and facilitating Kobe & Nash, the Lakers can outscore the Thunder inside. The Thunder gave up backup PG Eric Maynor for a trade exception, so they better hope Westbrook can carry more of the game (and not get hurt).
  • Cons – The Thunder are younger, faster, more cohesive, have Durant & Westbrook (and even Kevin Martin has replaced James Harden well!). Playing their up-tempo style of offense will exhaust the Lakers quickly.

If the Lakers get the 8th seed, would likely face the Spurs:

lakers vs spurs

  • Pros – The Spurs are in the same retirement home as the Lakers, except for a few younger players on both teams. Kobe & Pau are familiar with their outside-in style of play, can help Dwight, Nash, & Clark learn how to neutralize them if they pay attention to their plays. Earl Clark could be the swingman breakout that scores inside while Dwight & Kobe are extra covered.
  • Cons – Parker and role players are running a steady game pace, Duncan and others are still playing great defense, both can use their experience and familiarity with each other to outplay the Lakers. If the Spurs can frustrate Howard and double team Kobe they’ll force the rest of the Lakers to carry the scoring load– something that doesn’t look likely. 

lakers 2013 team

Even if the Lake Show managed to survive the 1st round, going into the 2nd round and/or the Western Conference Finals against (most likely) the other 1 or 2 teams would be insanely exhausting. And if by some sheer miracle the Lakers somehow (by the grace of God, Jordan, the Flying Spaghetti Monster, or nutella s’mores crepes) made it to the Finals, I could not fathom the Lakers beating the Heat after climbing that ridiculous mountain that is the West.

kobe-beat-jordan

However… if…. and I seriously mean IF the Lakers DID beat the Heat or anyone else in the Finals…. after the fuck of batshit insane crazy you-have-got-to-be-kidding-me-ness and what-else-could-go-wrong-ness that was the 2012-13 Lakers season….. then I would challenge ALL of you to say Kobe isn’t better than Jordan. MJ NEVER had a season filled with this much drama, bullshit, injuries, losses (owner’s death), team infighting, uncertainty, trade paranoia, media pressure, etc. etc. etc. It would mean 6 rings in 8 Finals appearance…. with this year’s potential one the absolute, all bullshit aside, HARDEST ring to earn. Durant in the West and LeBron out in the East simply add to that legacy of rival difficulty. I’m not saying this WILL happen… but if it did…. it would make this one of the historically most bipolar seasons for an NBA champion Lakers team EVER.

My all-time favorite TV show dramas, as of mid-February 2013

00 TV SHOWS BANNER

In the midst of the NBA discussions and arguments with my close buddies sometimes we stray into other fun areas like our favorite TV shows (most of us are TV junkies). It’s been a while since I’ve done this so I really hunkered down and ranked my favorite TV dramas as of February 15th, 2013. Yes, there are some scifi shows in there, but they are heavily dramatic. With enough of an intro, here’s my list:

1

1.   Breaking Bad – The only show that has gotten better each season consecutively. No one thought the Dad from Malcolm in the Middle would start out such a whimp and turn into the devil incarnate. Impressive feats all around and a seemingly endless stream of social references, conflicts, morality questioning, etc. etc.

2

2.   The Wire – Near perfection, just the 2nd season was a B+ compared to the As and A+s of the other 4 seasons. I’d even be okay with Breaking Bad and The Wire tying for 1st. Not much to say other than Bahador’s ‘The Wire is the Truth.’ SHEEEEEEEEIIIIIIITTTT damn straight.

3

3.   Game Of Thrones – An overly complex and geektastic fantasy war show captured the love of the masses, WOW. Seriously, the amount of geekery and complexity that has BOTH geeks and normal TV watchers alike immersed in the depth of names, backstories, conflicts, etc. etc. is just astounding.

4

4.   Rome (HBO) – Critically underrated for its complex ancient dealings, political strategy, etc. A sequel to Spartacus historically, but came out years before the Starz series. Just 2 seasons long it blends drama, violence, sex, and politics perfectly (while little brother Spartacus leans more on the sex and violence). Even with just 2 seasons it had a pretty damn perfect ending… though a 3rd season wouldn’t have hurt anyone.

5

5.   Firefly – Epic Joss Whedon goodness, still can’t believe Fox was retarded enough to cancel after just 1 season. The ‘closure’ movie Serenity left fans wanting more. This show basically secured the leading man-ness of Nathan Fillion and made any other choice to direct The Avengers other than Joss Whedon simply unacceptable.

6

6.   The Walking Dead – Came out of nowhere to grab the world by the balls like Game of Thrones, some characters really suck, some cool ones died too early, and there’s always the question of ‘what’s coming up next?’ which draws interest, but sometimes leaves fans wondering if its starting to wander.

7

7.   Doctor Who (Matt Smith years, 2011-current) – The long running BBC show switched its lead actor to an unknown and only got better in some ways. Matt Smith seemed more manic and bipolar at first, and quickly turned out to mask an ominous dark side. Companion Amy Pond has been witty and able to hold her own, and the new one taking her place is both gorgeous and sharp as a blade. FANTASTIC.

8

8.   The Sopranos – Love it like you do that Uncle that gets too drunk at family events a few times a year; he’s great most of the time and always there to give you some insanely violent love, but for weeks or months at a time he’ll get drunk on his own ego and barf out a bunch of WTF moments. Seasons 1 and 2 were perfect, it started to tumble about in seasons 3, 4, and 5, and finished up the last few mostly on high notes.

9

9.   The Americans – It has just 3 episodes under its FX belt but so far the 80s Cold War era spy thriller has a cool premise coupled with stellar acting by its co-leads. You find yourself sort of rooting FOR the Russian spys, while unsure of just who you really SHOULD be rooting for. Though its way to early to fix the show in the 9th spot, if it maintains this kind of quality for a full season it’ll get some much needed stability in its praise.

10

10.  House of Cards (Netflix) – Another newbie, though released in full by Netflix for its whole 1st season. Kevin Spacey nails it as a quadruple faced politician in Washington, and there’s so much epic awesomeness abound with insider politics, career screwing, and competitive double crossing. Two words: WATCH IT.

11

11.  Sherlock (BBC) – If you don’t know who Benedict Cumberbatch is then WATCH THIS SHOW. He is an amazing actor, in the vein of Michael Fassbender but more of a social chameleon. He basically got the role of the lead villain in the upcoming Star Trek Into Darkness and the voicing of villainous dragon Smaug in The Hobbit Trilogy from his turn as a modern, texting and functioning sociopathic Sherlock Holmes here. Even his sidekick Dr. Watson became Bilbo Baggins from this badassery. Sherlock Holmes has been done to death, but Sherlock really revamped it in a totally relevant and believable way.

12

12.  Mad Men – Oh how the mighty have fallen. Mad Men started out a show frequently counted in most people’s top 5 lists, but it’s continuing puffery and arrogance is starting to cost it. The most recent season was pretty damn good, and it’s getting more interesting seeing the characters’ lives shift from the white-picked-fence late 50s/early 60s to the more tumultuous mid to late 60s, but sometimes it feels like you’re just following people around instead of experiencing real drama develop. The quality of the show is still high, but certain background characters need to get developed and brought into the forefront (Sally, her little brother, and even Don’s new wife) while other long time regulars should start moving on in some believable ways (the old guy that walks around in his socks, Don’s first wife Betty, Betty’s new husband).

DCF 1.0

13.  Spartacus (Starz series) – Entertaining is the name of the game first and foremost, solid drama is the follow up that’s sometimes cast aside too quickly. The show was pretty surprisingly stellar in its first season with lead Andy Whitfield (pictured) as the leader of the slave rebellion. He brought grace and strength to the role, and the show almost perfectly balanced the sex & violence against the political maneuvering & personal dramas in the background. Whitfield’s unexpected onset of lymphoma forced a hiatus that led to a prequel mini-season without him, but it turned out to be pretty great, introduced characters (Gannicus especially) that would have more meaning later, and provided more insight to the mysterious pasts of many season 1 people. However, Whitfield eventually died and they recast the lead role for season 2 with an unknown who looked the part, but didn’t act it nearly as well. Season 2 mostly wandered about and leaned VERY heavily on the sex & violence to keep interest up, but sacrificed the more interesting dramatic elements. The current and final Season 3 is slowly balancing them all back out, and has regained much of its composure, but Andy Whitfield is still sorely missed, despite the new guy maturing a bit in his replacement status.

14

14.  Boardwalk Empire – The early days of the mob, bootlegging in the 1920s, a few high quality name actors, and connections to major historical crime figures– what could miss? Well what started out as an intriguing historical drama has gotten ‘high on its own supply’, namely the lavishness of the budget at the cost of the story. Seasons 1 and 2 were solid enough, but now things are wandering around for Nucky Thompson and the various threatening factions. The loss of Jimmy was a MAJOR one characterwise, given he was really the most interesting person on the show from a flawed character point of view. Most other characters are either pushed too far into the foreground (Margaret, Nucky’s brother, random politicians we never get to know enough about) or pulled back into the background when we want more of them (Richard Harrow, Chalky White). It needs a tough showrunner to clear the crap and set up real stakes, as last season was just chaotic at best.

15

15.  Doctor Who (David Tennant years 2006-2010) – David Tennant was really the first Doctor I was introduced to with this show, and for some time I was resistant to the more recent Matt Smith because Tennant’s hipster quicky oddball was so just out there awesome. But where Tennant’s tenure fell short was in its consistency with his companions. While Smith held onto Amy Pond and her husband Rory for 3 seasons, fleshing out relationships and backgrounds over time and making you really REALLY care, the showrunners of Tennant’s seasons had a new companion every season he was on board. His 1st season it was the wonderful Rose, with who he had real borderline sexual chemistry… but then the two girls in his 2nd and 3rd seasons were so random and out of nowhere it was tough to give a damn. David Tennant kept the Doctor witty, smart, and threatening, but you never felt he had a ‘dark side’, nor a companion that really didn’t want to leave.

16

16.  Lost – What is there to really say about the show started around the crash of Oceanic flight 815? It started off amazingly as a mysteriously, remotely religious, darkly scientific, strangely wtf show in its 1st and 2nd seasons, but then it started wobbling and tumbling into the abyss of just WTF. Seasons 3, 4, and 5 were really tough to get back into when most viewers started watching other stuff, but eventually the time travelling lunacy of season 6 helped lure some people back. Too many questions being asked and no real answers led to coining the term ‘the Damon Lindeloff curse’ where future shows/movies would have questions set up with little or no resolutions. In cases where buddy JJ Abrams helped reign in Damon’s inability to commit things would balance out well (Star Trek [2009], Mission Impossible III) but in others it would just piss people off (Super 8, Prometheus). Let’s hope Lindeloff is banned from the Star Trek Into Darkness and Star Wars: Episode VII sets so JJ Abrams can succeed in peace– for the good of both Trek and Wars scifi geek camps.

17

17.  The West Wing – The political drama that created a real market for political dramas. After Sports Night’s early termination it was good to see former Washington insider and well known coke addict Aaron Sorkin get back to work with this show about a democratic White House. The first few seasons were knock out great, but the preachy idealism that was fun in spouts early on just kept getting more and more pervasive. Whether you lean liberal or conservative, Democrat or Republican (or Independent) what started out as a show that had most people finding things to love in a few years transformed into a bloated, wandering show most people just wanted to put out of its own misery. Martin Sheen was kick ass as the President and Robe Lowe as Communications Officer for most of the show, as long as there was something worth fighting over… But by the time they each left, and for some reason former NYPD Blue co-lead Jimmy Smits became the next President, the magic was gone.

18

18.  Sports Night – Aaron Sorkin’s pre-West Wing (and pre-The Social Network for that matter) behind the scenes drama at a SportsCenter copycat was pretty damn awesome, though it was ended after just 2 seasons. The first stellar season was only hampered but a godawful laugh track the execs thought would be a good idea (is it a comedy? a drama? a dramedy???), and the second season did away with the track, but all seemed to almost ‘know’ they were in the cancellation crosshairs. There was a solid blend of drama, humor, insight, and political maneuvering for ‘just a show about sports’, but alas it all ended too quickly. It’s ranked so low because the network didn’t know what to do with it, and didn’t at least give it one more season to really grab its footing. Had the show come out now in 2013 it would have surely captured the attention of more sharp writing thirsty audiences, rather than the moron sitcommy TV viewers of the 90s and early 2000s (not that there’s anything wrong with that!).

19

19.  24 – Post 9/11 this was the go to show to satisfy the American hunger to hunting down terrorists. Liberal or conservative we could all get behind the sort of-Die Hard like Jack Bauer who was having a really REALLY bad day taking out terrorist threats in just a 24 hour period. Sure there was never any traffic anywhere and no one ever ate or slept, but it was kick ass seeing Kiefer Sutherland growl threats and bark demands like ‘WHERE ARE THE NUCLEAR WEAPONS?!? TELL ME NOW!!!’… But the show ran just too damn long, people got tired of the Iraq was and hunt for Osama Bin Laden, and Jack just kept having bad day after bad day after bad day. The last 2 seasons were have decent ‘apologies’ for the aimless chaos of the middle ones, but eventually it just had to end for goodness sake.

20

20.  House M.D. – Another Sherlock Holmes take, though in the medical world of sickness and disease! It was pretty damn fun watching Dr. House figure out what was killing people each week, and even better that in some weeks patients died– by House’s error, the disease beating him out, or both. There was a great balance of relationship handling, interesting cases, and even crazy outlandish patients keeping it all pretty interesting… But as some people left and were replaced by newbies, the quality really suffered. At some point there was only so many times you could hear about House’s drug addictions, and patients in threatening situations, or friends/allies forgiving House for being an ass over and Over and OVER again… This is a great lesson for showmakers like that of Breaking Bad and The Wire: Plan your show out for 3-5 years… NOT 6 or 7 or more because it gets stale and starts to reek of a desperate need to push ads and DVD/digital sales.

21

21.  Band of Brothers – An HBO (long) mini series about allied forces in WWII was extremely gritty and heartfelt, especially as the ‘TV show version of Saving Private Ryan’. Spielberg and Tom Hanks produced a great show that was only really set up for one long season. While it was enjoyable and emotional throughout, there would be many long periods (echoing real life for soldiers in WWII, no doubt) of boredom and wandering about until the next mission, or a surprise Axis attack. Some characters were strong and interesting, but none made a memorable impression once the show ended. Oh and the fact David Schwimmer was in it for a few episodes automatically kicked it down a few notches too.

22

22.  Dexter – Holy cow, a show that had some real fun and darkness to it because really bipolar and WTF very VERY quickly. Dexter had a great first season, despite the fun hiding a lot of plot holes and strange coincidences, but the 2nd season was so terrible that almost every subsequent season has been like an apology for it. The main character played by Michael C. Hall walks between being a threatening menace and almost laughably boring monotone loon, always just barely keeping viewers caring about him. His sister Deb has been just terrible through the whole show, dating turns-out-to-be killers, a guy older than her dad (CREEP FACTOR!), a co-worker, a police informant, and falling even MORE creepily for her brother… No wonder everyone hates her and doesn’t take her at ALL seriously. While a few middle seasons (3 and 5 come to mind) haven’t been all that bad, after Dexter’s love Rita died (the actress quit/got fired, depending on who you believe) it really took a tumble into writers hell. It’s gone on way too long and it’s good to know next season is the killer show’s last.

23

23.  Luther (BBC) – This is a show that is really hard to write about. In many ways, the 4 episode ‘1st series’ (as the Brits call it) was amazingless layered, dark, and immersive as it followed the seriously damaged but do-whatever-it-takes Detective John Luther and his developing cautious alliance with psychotic killer Alice. ‘Series 2’, however started off terrible and turned into a clusterfuck of shit. Most of the cast was revamped with new characters & actors (for various, lame reasons), Luther became more of a bore and pretty loathsome, and the new terror was so offensive and awful that I couldn’t even get past episode 2 of 4… Seriously, I didn’t even want to revisit the series because it just turned from wonderful to horrendous after ONE season. No word on if there’s going to be a 3rd season… or if anyone will want to watch it.

24

24.  Heroes – Another drama (a scifi, sort of comic book one at that) that’s really hard to explore. Heroes was a out of nowhere hit when its first season aired. It launched the careers of some then unknowns like Hayden Panettiere (all around hottie, stars in Nashville now), Zachary Quinto (Spock in the new Star Trek movies), and Jack Coleman (he’s ‘The Senator’ on The Office, has been a character actor for years). Also it truly amazingly blended fantasy, mystery, comics, legends, drama, national security threats, etc, etc. While the first season ended a bit quickly and without much interesting closure, people were still so excited for season 2… Then season 2 came, and it was just crap… The writing fell apart, characters became silly or stale, the epicness and looming threats formed in the first season never became realized, allies became enemies, enemies became allies, then both switched back, and all in all the show limped on for 3 more seasons after the 1st, never regaining the high praise or glory of the entrancing 1st season. It was brutally painful to watch something you love fall into dementia, and attempt to regain some sanity but constantly falling victim to its own expectations. Eventually it ended and no one cared, or really remembered just how great the premiere season was.

Critically acclaimed dramas not (yet) watched:  Oz, The Shield, Fringe, Homeland, Battlestar Galactica, Treme, Sons of Anarchy, Weeds

11 categories which define the NBA’s Free Agent Class of Summer 2014

FreeAgentClass

In a recent email chat with my NBA buddies I was asked who were going to be the NBA’s available free agents in Summer 2014– for when the Lakers are supposedly making a push for the post-Kobe Bryant era. It’s not such a simple question given restricted vs. unrestricted statuses, etc. So I put together a comprehensive financial guide of all the NBA players and their upcoming statues.

I created a detailed spreadsheet has all the specifics I gleaned from HoopsHype’s NBA salaries pages, and it’s free to check out here:  http://bit.ly/UoUGGZ

Just for reference here are the 11 categories and 2-5 examples of the highest paid players in each segment:

1.  Free Agent if team doesn’t extend Qualifying Offer for 2014-15:

  • John Wall
  • Evan Turner
  • Derrick Favors
  • DeMarcus Cousins 

2.  Not available as a Free Agent, under contract beyond the 2013-14 season:

  • Amare Stoudemire
  • Joe Johnson
  • Kevin Durant
  • Blake Griffin
  • Deron Williams

3.  Player Option for 2013-14 then Unrestricted Free Agent, or can be Free Agent for the 2013-14 season:

  • Andre Iguodala
  • Ben Gordon
  • Hidayet Turkoglu
  • Richard Jefferson
  • Monta Ellis

4.  Player Option for 2014-15, else Unrestricted Free Agent in Summer 2014:

  • Carmelo Anthony
  • LeBron James
  • Chris Bosh
  • Dwyane Wade
  • Rudy Gay

5.  Team Option for 2013-14 AND 2014-15:

  • Robin Lopez
  • DeShawn Stevenson
  • Aleksandar Pavlovic
  • Willie Green

6.  Team Option for 2013-14 then Unrestricted Free Agent, else Free Agent earlier:

  • Francisco Garcia
  • Richard Hamilton
  • Hakim Warrick
  • Carlos Delfino
  • Greg Stiemsma

7.  Team Option for 2014-15, else Unrestricted Free Agent in Summer 2014:

  • Anderson Varejao
  • Jameer Nelson
  • John Salmons
  • Kyrie Irving
  • Anthony Davis

8.  Team Qualifying Offer for 2013-14 possible then Restricted Free Agent for 2 yrs (only 2 players):

  • Kawhi Leonard
  • Cory Joseph

9.  Team Qualifying Offer for 2013-14 possible then Unrestricted Free Agent, else Free Agent earlier:

  • Tyreke Evans
  • Tiago Splitter
  • Brandon Jennings
  • Gerald Henderson
  • Tyler Hansbrough

10.  Unrestricted Free Agent after 2013-14, no additional variables:

  • Kobe Bryant
  • Dirk Nowitzki
  • Pau Gasol
  • Paul Pierce
  • Emeka Okafor

11.  Unknown, might be signed earlier or out of the league:

  • Gilbert Arenas
  • Brandon Roy
  • Andray Blatche
  • Josh Childress
  • Brendan Haywood

Thoughts??

Lakers, Kings, and Grizzlies may have the answers to each others’ problems

The Los Angeles Lakers are struggling, so are the Sacramento Kings (soon to be Seattle-bound Sonics??), and the Memphis Grizzlies are already thinking ahead by wanting to trade Rudy Gay for more manageable financial assets. So what do you think of this possible trade scenario:

Screen Shot 2013-01-09 at 6.00.39 PM

Lakers win because:

  • Get two young and dynamic, and defensive-minded scorers in Gay & Evans… and lord knows the Lakers NEED defensive-minded scorers.
  • Set themselves up for Dwight’s future with 2 guys (1 locked up now, the other after the season if he does well).
  • Gay is a solid swingman who can learn from Kobe, while Evans learns from both Nash and Kobe as a combo guard.
  • Gets the team younger and faster immediately instead of waiting with further uncertainly.

Lakers lose because:

  • They entrench themselves in D’Antoni’s run-n-gun style by getting rid of Pau.
  • Lose on some of the interior presence they had with the Dwight/Pau twin towers (though they didn’t seem to work well under Mike D anyway).
  • Unsure how Gay & Evans will respond to playing behind Nash & Kobe this season.
  • Nash might be okay letting Evans start with Kobe, but no way Kobe lets Gay start over him.
  • Maybe an Evans-Kobe-Gay perimeter might be workable, with Metta or Jamison at PF.

Kings (Sonics) win because:

  • Get the mentor for DeMarcus Cousins they sorely need in Pau.
  • Even create a dynamic finesse/power duo in Pau/DeMarcus.
  • Open up PG logjam with Evans and give Fredette and Thomas more playing time.
  • Clear out longer, heavy contracts of Salmons and Thompson.
  • Get a serviceable backup to Cousins in Haddadi.

Kings (Sonics) lose because:

  • Have to take on Pau’s hefty contract this year and the next.
  • Turning 3 players into 2, really with 1 of them (Pau) serving as a contributor.
  • May need to slow down their style of play with Pau in the rotation (might actually be a good thing).
  • Still need to figure out if Keith Smart is staying head coach, and how he will use Pau with Cousins demanding the ball so much.

Grizzlies win because:

  • Get rid of Rudy Gay’s big contract and don’t need to take back as hefty contracts in return.
  • Jason Thompson is having a great season and his relatively cheap 5 year contract ensures he maxes out at just $6.8 million 5 years from now.
  • Salmons’ contract actually goes DOWN to $7.6 million next season (2nd year of contract) and then to just $7.0 million in the final, 3rd year, which is actually a team option so they can just cut him and save from paying him.
  • Move Haddadi who, in the past, has complained openly about his role with the team. Gives other players a chance to back up Marc Gasol & Z-Bo.

Grizzlies lose because:

  • They must break up the Gay-Marc Gasol-Z-Bo core to save money (luxury taxes) soon.
  • Losing Gay means more of the scoring load falls on Marc, Zach Randolph, and Mike Conley Jr., as well as one less speedy perimeter defender in Gay.
  • Marc Gasol and Zach Randolph usually play together, so getting a backup to one or both now falls to new guy Jason Thompson, and others still on the team when Haddadi is traded.

Overall, I think this is really a win-win-win for all 3 teams, despite whatever the ESPN trade machine says. As I just told a good friend I chat with often:

Grizz need to save money, can’t afford to keep Gay, get a cheap young rising star and an old guy they can cut soon.

  • WIN FOR THEM.

Kings need a mentor for Cousins NOW, and someone older to get the young’uns to play nice. Also, Evans has no future with 3 other PGs taking his mins.

  • WIN FOR THEM.

Lakers need perimeter defense and scoring, and need to win NOW while Kobe and Dwight are together. Also not afraid to spend (except to re-hire Phil).

  • WIN FOR THEM.